SuperSize: The New Abnormal
Portions have steadily increased
over the last several decades, both in restaurants and in homes. The general population is aware of this, but
many don’t realize how this affects what we see as “normal”. The kids I teach now think a 20 ounce soda is
a “normal” size. When I tell them that a
12 ounce soda was the size when I was growing up they respond with, “Well that’s
not enough”. Granted you can now find
sodas in an 8 ounce size, but they defeat the purpose when instead of just a
6-pack they sell them in an 8-pack size.
Who are we kidding? The 8 ounce
soda you can slurp down in one gulp and only leaves you wanting more. (I must tell you that I haven’t had a soda
since 2000. But while I’m targeting
soda, this can be any sugary drink. My
vice: coffee). Let’s take a step back and look how much
things have changed - and why it
matters.
The average restaurant meal is
four times larger than it was in the 1950’s.
For example, a hamburger in the 50’s was 3.9 ounces, French fries 2.4
ounces, and soda 7 ounces. Today those
numbers have jumped to a hamburger that’s 12 ounces, French fries 6.7 ounces,
and soda 42 ounces. Another good
example I give the children when I’m teaching them is with the bagel. A bagel has increased from a 3-inch diameter
(130 calories) to 6 inches (350 calories).
I bring in the bagel thins and the “mini-bagels” to show them that those
“mini-bagels” are really what a bagel should look like. Bagel thins keep the 6-inch diameter but remove
the middle to minimize calories – another creation in our distorted view of
portions. All of these are BIG changes,
pun intended!
Just in the last week it was
announced that Mega M&M’s® are coming in 2014! Each candy has three times as much chocolate
as a regular M&M, coated with the traditional candy shell. M&M’s look comically small when we hold
them in our chubby North American hands.
Good thing they’ve come up with a solution for that!
So how does this affect our
eating? People eat at least 30% more
with larger portions. Frequent exposure
to these bigger-than-life portions affects people’s perception as well, leading
consumers to see them as an appropriate size, what I like to call “portion
distortion.” Even while people are
eating more with these larger portions, they don’t report an increased level of
satisfaction or fullness.
I believe that everyone needs to
think about how portions affect intake – and the future intake of their
children. I try and teach children what normal
portion sizes are – even though they believe differently already. Research shows that parents are encouraging
their young children to eat more at meals and snacks (because of this distorted
view of portions.) As children age and
enter the world of huge portions, this can have negative consequences. Gone are the days of the “finish your plate
so that you can get up from the table.” We
should be teaching them to pay attention to their bodies’ cues: hunger versus eating because they’re bored;
fullness to stop eating versus eating till they feel uncomfortable.
I believe if more people
questioned the value of large portions, split entrees at restaurants, and
ordered the smallest servings, we would see some change in what (and how much)
is offered.
No comments:
Post a Comment